Your AI Agents can now act on comments added in BugSmash with our MCP. See How it works.
All case studies
EDUCATIONAL PUBLISHING - EDUCATIONAL MATERIALS

Four kinds of expert review every coursebook. The feedback used to arrive as WhatsApp screenshots.

Ahmad Zaytoun develops English language coursebooks with a team of ten, all freelance, none of them working the same hours. Getting design, language, media and content people to agree on one page was the job.

The ELT School logo
AZAhmad ZaytounEducational Materials Developer, The ELT School
CompanyThe ELT School
IndustryEducational publishing - English language materials
Based inIstanbul - a team of ten
ProfileEnglish language learning materials and coursebooks reviewed by design, language, media and content specialists.
80%+
less time spent on feedback
10 to 15
people reviewing in a typical month
5
formats: PDF, audio, video, docs, web

The work

A coursebook is not one person's document. Developing educational materials runs through many stages, and at each one a different professional with a different role weighs in: design, language, media, content. Four kinds of expertise, four vocabularies, all pointed at the same page.

Ahmad's team of ten are freelancers. Nobody shares a schedule, which means every review has to work without the people in it being available at the same time. Asynchronous is not a preference here, it is the only way the work moves.

The problem

Feedback came as screenshots over WhatsApp, and as comments added to a PDF that then had to be sent around as a file. Every point was then discussed in text messages alongside the artefact rather than on it.

Ahmad's summary of that arrangement is two words: messy, to say the least. It failed in two specific ways. Finding a particular comment again was genuinely difficult, because comments lived in a chat log rather than anywhere structured. And discussing any single point meant reconstructing which point everyone was talking about before the discussion could start.

What changed

He went looking because the old way had become intolerable, found BugSmash, and thought it might be the answer. Setup did not slow him down: he signed up and had his first project uploaded within seconds, on an interface he found immediately intuitive.

The pieces that carry a ten person freelance review:

Folders and sub folders, with access granted per person. The reviewer who handles language does not have to wade through everything else, and a project with many stages stays navigable.
Version compare. Ahmad's single indispensable feature. Checking what changed between drafts stops being an act of memory.
Every format the work actually takes. They started on PDFs and now run audio, video, Word documents and websites through the same place, which matters when a coursebook ships with recordings as well as pages.
Comments that sit on the material. The discussion happens where the point is, so nobody has to establish what is being referred to first.
BEFORE
Screenshots over WhatsApp, comments in a PDF
Every point discussed in a separate text thread
Genuinely hard to find one specific comment again
Reviews that stalled on people being available
WITH BUGSMASH
One place per project, structured in folders
Discussion attached to the point it is about
Version compare instead of remembering
Access granted per person, per project

The result

Ahmad puts the change at at least 80% less time spent on feedback . The second effect matters as much on a distributed team: work continues even though nobody shares a schedule, and sign-offs land faster precisely because they no longer wait for everyone to be awake at once.

Asked for the single biggest difference, he did not pick a feature that saves clicks. He picked organisation: folders and sub folders, and being able to grant access to specific people, is what makes running the projects manageable at all.

His own summary of the effect is that stress went down and the whole process now looks more professional. And, in an aside worth noticing on a task most teams find tedious, that it is fun.

BugSmash is like having a home for your feedback.

AZAhmad ZaytounEducational Materials Developer, The ELT School

Who he would tell

Anyone involved in feedback, internal or external. He does not narrow it further, and given his own use runs from a PDF page layout to an audio recording to a website, the breadth is the point.

What his team values most is not on the feature list: that the people building it keep shipping and keep listening. His advice to anyone weighing it up is shorter than any of this.

1

Don't hesitate, try it and see for yourself.

Case study prepared with Ahmad Zaytoun of The ELT School. Published with his permission.

Frequently asked questions

What did The ELT School use BugSmash for?

The ELT School used BugSmash to collect contextual feedback across PDF, Audio, Video, Docs, Websites and keep review decisions in one shared workflow.

Get your unbilled hours back

Start today, it's free

Set up your first review in under a minute. No credit card, no onboarding calls.

BugSmash website review interface with comment controls